The Idiotic Villager The Idiotic Villager The Idiotic Villager

Thursday, June 18, 2009

The Divine Question

Yes, I am still alive.
I promised a few posts ago that I will dedicate a post to religion. Well, I'm not going to do that. All I will say is that Religion is a concept that some people need, some people want, and some people exploit. To each his own. Amen.
Now, the reason for my extended silence is life. No, I was not too busy. No, I was not pre-occupied (which means the same as busy, but sounds more impressive.) The truth is that I totally forgot I had a blog. There, I have said it, nobody reads it anyway!
Right, so now back to business. Today, I want to write about the concept of right and wrong. On the surface, the legal system of a country (a country being the biggest independent governing unit today) seems to define what a person may or may not do. But do we know all the laws in our constitution? Rather, do we need to know all the laws? The answer is no, we don't. So how do we know what we can and we shouldn't do? The term that suggests itself here is 'Social-Conformity'.
Yes, we are brought up in a society. Man is a social animal...blah blah... Society imbibes in us the concept of right and wrong through many agents. The most influential being parents, teachers, friends, relatives etc... basically, people that we come in contact with. The closer the contact, the more the influence.
Now, if our value-system (concept of right and wrong) was created totally based on these inputs alone, everything would have been perfect. No clashes of interests. But the biggest conflict today is not between right and wrong. Rather, it is between your right and my right.
In fact, every individual person seems to have their own unique concept of right and wrong, a custom-tailored value system. Conflict occurs when two people with incompatible value-systems interact. As a simple example, consider a person who loves classical music and another who happens to be a metal-head. Let us put them both in the same room with nothing to do and a nice stereo system with all the music in the world. We have a conflict. Who gets to choose the music? All the classical wusses out there would side with the classical wimp and all the metal-freaks will side with the metal-maniac.
Thus, when two incompatible value-systems clash, there is an argument, a fight, or even a war. The Americans clearly state this is all war-movies. There is always a scene with a senior officer (usually the first citizen) justifying the war with the exact words, "to protect our way of life."
At this point, we can all agree that everyone has their own value-system. But human life is full of interactions, and as each value-system is inherently unique, conflict is bound to occur. So how do we resolve such clashes? In animal or primitive human societies, conflict is resolved by a comparison of strength. 'Might is always right' was the rule. Sadly, this is true even in todays "evolved" human society.
When one is a child, the bigger (physical power) person is always right. When one grows up, the richer (monetary power) person seems to be always right. When it comes to a work-place, the boss (power to fire you) it always right. In a store, the customer (power of money) is always right. When it comes to bigger units, like countries, the country with the biggest nuke is always right. Hence, the 'might is right' rule still seems to be in force, which makes a pretty primitive species.
So, what should be considered right? The answer is 'power of numbers'. Yes, democracy. A value system that is compatible with a majority of people will generate the least number of conflicts. This is what social-conformity aims to achieve. The flaws in today's society are not with this concept, rather they are due to imperfect implementation. Many groups of people (eg. Teenagers) are inadequately represented or given less importance in the equation that supposedly yields the best value-system.
As a personal rule, I suggest the following:

"Do what you feel is right, as long as it doesn't conflict with the value-system of those who have power over you."

How do you know that some action conflicts with somebody's value system? It pisses them off! That's how.
I sure hope I have set some of you thinking. Do post your comments on what you think.
Cheers!

5 comments:

EbstR said...

ya dude soceity sucks wen it comes to certain things !! good thought to resume wit :)
neways keep going ..
n ya i ve an update ..not dat new .. but fun to read .. try !

so..happy bloggin :P

Sandy said...

Thanks for commenting Eb$tR!
I hope u will come back for more!

WinGMaker said...

Hey!!
I proved u wrong...Strike one!
I am following you..Strike two!
No i am not stalking you..Strike three!

You're old..out cold..dead meat!

Now..lets get back to reality..The only reality is i was wondering where the village idiot was..and lo..i found him!

And by the way..not all teen can vote...only those who are eight-teen or nine-teen..having proper ID's can do...
:P :P
sorry..didn't take the meds today...the doctors gone with another guy!
I tried apple..it didn't work!

Yeah...I agree the imperfect implementation of social conformity..but... do you always think might is always right?

I mean might always wins would be more thought provoking...

But then if might is always right or if it always wins...then why should be the social system be imperfect? The minority should have perished under the feets of their rulers since they have different value-system...
Which shall lead us to a conclusion..as you claim.."Democracy" -- the correct way to go about..and its trying to beat the majority...as in provide equal representation...

Hence Democracy is not being imperfect..its just has a difficult job....

Now i dont want you to suggest increasing reservations..that makes the majority a minority and the minority..ARROGANT!

Sandy said...

@WinGMaker
Hey there!
Glad someone finally found me :)

I still think that might is always right (means the same as might always wins). The reason that the minority has not perished may be due to their submissive nature, or because they do not have anything that the majority wants to take (like their lives).

The final and most probable reason I can think of right now are the opposing forces that I did not talk about in my post viz those of sympathy, compassion, guilt, love ...etc on the part of the stronger party.

Welcome to The Village Idiot :)
Keep reading.

NJ- The NevaJazz said...

All religions, arts and sciences are branches of the same tree. All these aspirations are directed toward ennobling man's life, lifting it from the sphere of mere physical existence and leading the individual towards freedom.
by albert einstein